![]() View Section 106 Programmatic Agreement Documents: A draft Historic Properties Treatment Plan is included as one of the attachments to the draft PA. The draft PA establishes a process for future identification, evaluation, assessment of effects, and consultations if needed based on changes in the APE or an inadvertent discovery of NRHP eligible cultural resources. As a result of these Project considerations, FRA intends to negotiate a Programmatic Agreement (PA) to govern the phased approach for ongoing compliance with Section 106 and implementation of the resolution of adverse effects. The nature of the Project’s anticipated design refinements requires a phased approach for ongoing compliance with Section 106, and the Project also requires a process for avoiding, minimizing, and/or mitigating adverse effects. ![]() FRA has received comments from Consulting Parties and considered those comments for revisions to technical reports and when making determinations of effects caused by the undertaking. ![]() Those efforts have been documented in draft and final technical reports, communicated to Consulting Parties through letters and one-on-one meetings, and discussed in meetings of the Cultural Resources Working Group. Since reinitiation of the Project in 2019, in compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Section 106), FRA has conducted cultural resources inventory, evaluation of National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) eligibility of cultural resources, and assessment of effects caused by the undertaking to historic properties within the area of potential effects (APE). FRA most recently completed a reevaluation of the FEIS and ROD in September 2020. The project would use proven high-speed rail technology and be constructed as a grade-separated, dedicated passenger-only railroad predominantly in the median of or immediately alongside Interstate 15 (I-15), adding transportation capacity to the freeway corridor.įRA, in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), Surface Transportation Board (STB), Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and the National Park Service (NPS), prepared a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) in March 2009, a Supplemental DEIS in August 2010, a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) in March 2011, and a Record of Decision (ROD) in July 2011. The Las Vegas to Victor Valley project is proposed by the project sponsor, Brightline West, to provide reliable and safe passenger rail transportation along an approximate 200-mile corridor between Southern California (Victorville) and Las Vegas, Nevada, as an alternative to automobile or air travel. The Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) is the lead federal agency for the environmental review of the DesertXpress High-Speed Passenger Train project, which was rebranded as the XpressWest project in 2012, and rebranded again in 2022 as the Brightline West – Las Vegas to Victor Valley Project.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |